Which wildlife management practice is considered humane and effective for wildlife control?

The practice of exclusion is considered a humane and effective method for wildlife control because it focuses on preventing wildlife from accessing areas where they may cause harm or become a nuisance. This method involves identifying potential entry points for wildlife and sealing them off to prevent access. It is a non-lethal approach that allows for the coexistence of humans and wildlife while minimizing conflicts and preventing damage to property or spread of disease.

Exclusion is favored not only for its humane nature but also for its long-term effectiveness. Once animals are denied access, there is a lower likelihood of re-infestation, resulting in sustainable wildlife management. This method often involves the use of physical barriers, modifications to the environment, and habitat management, which effectively deter wildlife without the need for lethal intervention.

In contrast, trapping and removal can be effective in the short term but may not address the root cause of the wildlife problem. Hunting and poisoning pose ethical concerns, particularly regarding animal welfare and the potential for unintended consequences on non-target species and the environment. Therefore, exclusion stands out as the most humane and effective strategy for managing wildlife issues.